研究者詳細 - 倉田　敬子

論文 - 倉田　敬子

分割表示 87 件中 21 - 40 件目／全件表示 >>

Identifying the Complex Position of Research Data and Data Sharing Among Researchers in Natural Science

K Kurata, M Matsubayashi, S Mine

SAGE Open 7 (3), 2158244017717301 7 （ 3 ） 2017年

研究論文（学術雑誌）, 共著, 査読有り, ISSN 2158-2440

<p>This article aims to provide an overview of researchers’ practices and perceptions on data use and sharing. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 23 Japanese researchers in the natural sciences to identify their research practices and data use, including data sharing. We divided the interview scripts into meaningful phrases as a unit of analysis. Next, we focused on 406 statements on research data and reanalyzed them based on four aspects: stance on research data, practices and perceptions of data use, range of data sharing, and data type. A cluster analysis identified 14 clusters, which were divided into five groups: open access for data, restricted access for data, data interpretation, data processing and preservation, and data infrastructure. Our results reveal the complexity and diversity of the relationship between data and research practices. That is, the practice of research data sharing is heterogeneous, with no “one size fits all” between and among researchers.</p>

Access to Document (DOI)

日本の大学・研究機関における研究データの管理, 保管, 公開: 質問紙調査に基づく現状報告

倉田敬子, 松林麻実子，武田将季

情報管理 60 （ 2 ） 119 - 127 2017年

研究論文（学術雑誌）

研究データ共有に関して, 新しい研究のあり方のビジョン, 国・地域を超えた標準的ルールの設定, 国・地域としての推進策などが議論されている. しかし, 研究におけるデータ共有を推進するための具体的な施策については, 海外でも事例報告や現状調査がなされだしたところである. 本稿では, 日本の大学・研究機関における, 研究データの管理, 保管, 公開の現状に関して行った質問紙調査の結果を報告する. 494 機関に対して, 研究データのオープン化の現状認識, 研究データに関するガイドラインおよび管理計画, 研究データ公開のための機関としての整備状況などについて尋ねた. その結果, データ管理計画もデータ保管のための整備もほとんど進んでいないこと, 研究不正行為への対応のためのガイドラインのみ対応がなされていることが明らかになった.

Access to Document (DOI)

図書館情報学　第二版

上田修一，倉田敬子

2017年

ウェブ環境における情報検索スキル

南友紀子，岩瀬梓，宮田洋輔，石田栄美，上田修一，倉田敬子

日本図書館情報学会誌 62 （ 3 ） 163 - 180 2016年09月

研究論文（学術雑誌）, 共著, 査読有り

本研究では, van Deursen らの「デジタルスキル」を基礎に, 従来の情報検索の専門的なスキルを組み込んだウェブ環境における情報検索スキルの現状を明らかにすることを目的とする質問紙調査を行った. 2014 年 8 月にオンライン調査を実施し, 1,551 名から回答を得た. その結果, ウェブ環境で検索を行う人々は,(1) ブール演算子などの高度な情報検索技法は用いない,(2) ウェブ上の情報の形式は理解している,(3) 検索語の選定に対する意識は高い,(4) 一定の評価方針のもとに複数の検索結果を閲覧する,(5) インターネットから恩恵を受けていると感じている, ことが明らかになった. 階層的クラスタリングにより回答者を 8 クラスタに分割し, 高い情報検索スキルを持つクラスタを特定した. この高能力者群は, 比較的若く, 男性が多く, 学歴が高く, 批判的思考能力と自己認識が高かった. 高能力者群は全てのスキルの平均得点が最も高いが, 検索技法に関するスキルのみ得点は大幅に低かった.

Access to Document (DOI)

オープンアクセスの進展と新たな展開 (特集全国研究集会再発見! 専門図書館のインパクト)--(第 5 分科会学術情報流通の現状と将来)

倉田敬子

専門図書館（ 279 ） 64－69 2016年09月

研究論文（大学，研究機関等紀要）, 単著, ISSN 0385-0188

日本における健康医学情報の探索行動: 2008 年および 2013 年調査の結果

酒井由紀子，國本千裕，倉田敬子

日本図書館情報学会誌 61 （ 2 ） 82 - 95 2015年06月

研究論文（学術雑誌）, 共著, 査読有り, ISSN 1344-8668

目的: 本研究の目的は, 日本における健康医学情報の探索行動の実態を明らかにすることにある. 方法: 2013 年 11~ 12 月に戸別訪問質問紙留置調査を実施し, 全国の 15~ 79 歳の男女 1,200 人から回答を得た. 2008 年調査との比較も含め結果を分析した. 結果: 有効回答 1,197 人の内 48.0% が過去 2 年間に実際に健康医学情報を探していた. 探索主題として 5 割を超えたのは, 病気 (77.2%) と医師や病院 (56.3%) である. 情報源は, インターネット (58.7%) が医師 (53.4%) を上回った. 得られた情報の影響は「安心感を得た」(46.2%) が最も多い.「医学論文を読みたい」という回答はやや減少したが, 英語と日本語, 有料と無料を合わせ 49.2% であった. 結論: インターネットの利用の割合は増えたが, 健康医学情報を探索する人の割合は変わらなかった. 医学論文が一般の人々の情報源となる可能性も, 引き続き示唆された.

Access to Document (DOI)

e-Science とは (< 特集> e-Science とその周辺~ 現状とこれから~)

倉田敬子

情報の科学と技術 63 （ 9 ） 352 - 357 2013年09月

研究論文（大学，研究機関等紀要）, 単著

e-Science を厳密に定義することなく, 検討する視点として 1) 研究プロセスと 2) 基盤を, 指向として 1) 技術的と 2) 社会的を定めた. 当初から, 研究を支援する基盤という方向からの議論が存在した. 研究プロセスとしての e-Science の構成要素として, 1) 共同性として「共同研究」と「オープンサイエンス」を, 2) データとして「データ駆動科学」と「データ共有」を挙げた. オープンサイエンスとデータ共有が最近は注目されてきていることを示した. 現在のところ, 研究者はデータ共有の意義は認めながらも消極的であることを述べた.

Access to Document (DOI)

Remarkable Growth of Open Access in the Biomedical Field: Analysis of PubMed Articles from 2006 to 2010

Kurata, K. and Morioka, T. and Yokoi, K. and Matsubayashi, M.

PLoS ONE 8 （ 5 ） 2013年05月

研究論文（学術雑誌）, 共著, 査読有り

Introduction：This study clarifies the trends observed in open access (OA) in the biomedical field between 2006 and 2010, and explores the possible explanations for the differences in OA rates revealed in recent surveys.
Methods：The study consists of a main survey and two supplementary surveys. In the main survey, a manual Google search was performed to investigate whether full-text versions of articles from PubMed were freely available. Target samples were articles published in 2005, 2007, and 2009; the searches were performed a year after publication in 2006, 2008, and 2010, respectively. Using the search results, we classified the OA provision methods into seven categories. The supplementary surveys calculated the OA rate using two search functions on PubMed: “LinkOut” and “Limits.”
Results：The main survey concluded that the OA rate increased significantly between 2006 and 2010: the OA rate in 2010 (50.2%) was twice that in 2006 (26.3%). Furthermore, majority of OA articles were available from OA journal (OAJ) websites, indicating that OAJs have consistently been a significant contributor to OA throughout the period. OA availability through the PubMed Central (PMC) repository also increased significantly. OA rates obtained from two supplementary surveys were lower than those found in the main survey. “LinkOut” could find only 40% of OA articles in the main survey.
Discussion：OA articles in the biomedical field have more than a 50% share. OA has been achieved through OAJs. The reason why the OA rates in our surveys are different from those in recent surveys seems to be the difference in sampling methods and verification procedures.

Access to Document (DOI)

Health information seekers in Japan: A snapshot of needs, behavior, and recognition in 2008

Sakai, Y. and Kunimoto Prof., C. and Kurata, K.

Journal of the Medical Library Association 100 （ 3 ） 205 - 213 2012年07月

研究論文（学術雑誌）, 共著, 査読有り

Objectives:
The purpose of this study was to explore the latest information-seeking behavior among health care consumers in Japan and to compare these behaviors with those recorded in similar surveys administered in Japan and the United States after 2000.
Method:
The authors conducted a randomized, population-based, door-to-door survey in 2008. A total of 1,200 Japanese adults over 15 years of age completed the questionnaire.
Main Results:
The results from 1,189 valid responses indicated that slightly more than half the number of participants had actively sought health information during the previous 2 years. Most seekers looked for information on a specific disease. “Physicians” remained the respondents' first choice as an information source, while “Internet” has gained greater popularity as a resource since the previous survey in 2000. Half the number of participants stated that they were willing to read academic or professional medical journal articles if written in Japanese and provided free of charge.
Conclusion:
The evidence indicates that Japanese health care consumers are now proactively seeking health information. These consumers feel reassured by the information they can access and would like to read clinical research in their native language.

Access to Document (DOI)

The changes in Japanese researchers' usage and perception of electronic resources: Result of SCREAL survey 2011

Sato, Y. and Koyama, K. and Mine, S. and Kurata, K. and Itsumura, H. and Takeuchi, H. and Tutiya, S.

Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting 49 （ 1 ） 2012年

研究論文（国際会議プロシーディングス）, 共著, 査読有り

The Standing Committee for Research on Academic Libraries (SCREAL), in cooperation with 45 institutions in Japan, conducted a questionnaire survey from October to December 2011. As a result, 3,922 valid responses across various fields were collected. Following up this survey, we attempt here to clarify how usage and perception of ejournals and scholarly articles among researchers and graduate students in Japan changed. The basic findings were as follows. 1) More than 90% of respondents in natural sciences, including pharmaceutical science, chemistry, biology, physics and medicine, reported that they used e-journals at least once or twice a month. 2) Ejournals were not as heavily used in humanities and social sciences as in natural sciences, but the proportion of regular users turned out to be more than 4 times that of the 2001 survey. 3) This difference in e-journals usage by discipline is strongly associated with the degree of dependence on domestic documents written in Japanese. The two groups of respondents, users of international documents and users of domestic documents, showed a statistically significant difference in answering the question concerning "Frequency of e-journals use." 4) Attitude to the necessity of printed version drastically transmuted. 62.3% of respondents in natural sciences and 53.6% in humanities and social sciences thought "printed journals are unnecessary when e-journals are accessible." 5) Use of digital devices for e-books was not popular as yet, but the respondents expressed their high interest in the future use. Some preliminary discussion is made to identify the factors affecting the usage and/or perception of electronic resources by Japanese researchers.

Access to Document (DOI)

オープンアクセスの理念と現状

倉田敬子

メディア教育研究 7 （ 2 ） S42-S49 2011年03月

研究論文（大学，研究機関等紀要）, 単著

08802641520020111012184118PDF1.pdf

オープンアクセスとは何か

倉田敬子

情報の科学と技術 60 （ 4 ） 132-137 2010年04月

研究論文（学術雑誌）, 単著

電子ジャーナルへの変化の意味

倉田敬子

中部図書館情報学会誌 50 1-18 2010年03月

研究論文（学術雑誌）, 単著

Enhancing open access in the biomedical field

Kurata, K. and Matsubayashi, M. and Mine, S. and Yokoi, K. and Morioka, T.

Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting 47 2010年

Access to Document (DOI)

Analyzing viewing patterns while reading picture books

Ishita, E. and Mine, S. and Kunimoto, C. and Shiozaki, J. and Kurata, K. and Ueda, S.

Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries 2010年

Access to Document (DOI)

電子ジャーナルとオープンアクセス環境下における日本の医学研究者の論文利用および入手行動の特徴

倉田敬子；三根慎二；森岡倫子；酒井由紀子；加藤信哉；上田修一

Library and Information Science （ 61 ） 59-90 - 90 2009年07月

研究論文（学術雑誌）, 共著, 査読有り, ISSN 0373-4447

Purpose: This paper describes the current state of electronic journal usage among Japanese medical researchers, and discusses the subsequent effect on users' decision whether to read articles on paper or on screen; from what types of full text source they obtain the articles. Methods: The names of 2,033 medical researchers affiliated with 80 medical schools in Japan were extracted and the researchers were surveyed. The questionnaire included questions on: 1) demographic features; 2) whether or not the researcher read the paper from print journals or electronic journals, and the search method used to obtain the most recently read articles; 3) the types of methods used to search for articles; 4) awareness and use of "open access" sites. Results: We received 651 responses (32.3%) between February and March 2007 and analyzed them. The major findings were: 1) 70% of the most recently read articles were electronic journal articles; 2) 80% of the electronic journal articles were provided by academic libraries, while 60% of print journal articles were from private subscription journals; 3) search engines were not used, but PubMed was used primarily to search either print or electronic journal articles; 4) in general, open access methods were not recognized by researchers as one possible route for obtaining the articles although PubMed Central constituted about 10% of the most recently read electronic journal articles; 5) no significant differences relating to article usage patterns were observed among age groups, however, large differences were found among fields of research.

Status of open access in biomedical field in 2005

Matsubayashi,Mamiko;Kurata,Keiko;Sakai,Yukiko; Morioka, Tomoko; Kato, Shinya; Mine,Shinji ; Ueda, Shuichi

Journal of Medical Library Association 97 （ 1 ） 4-11 2009年01月

研究論文（学術雑誌）, 共著, 査読有り

Status of open access in the biomedical field in 2005

Matsubayashi, M. and Kurata, K. and Sakai, Y. and Morioka, T. and Kato, S. and Mine, S. and Ueda, S.

Journal of the Medical Library Association 97 （ 1 ） 4 - 11 2009年