Papers - Nishikida Aiko

「外国人の市民権とは――グローバル市民への視点」

錦田愛子

『多文化「共創」社会入門――移民・難民とともに暮らし、互いに学ぶ社会へ』 (慶應義塾大学出版会)     92 - 100 2016.10

Research paper (other academic), Single Work

アラブ諸国のパスポート

錦田愛子

『パスポート学』 (北海道大学出版会)     47 - 51 2016.10

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work, Accepted

移民／難民とパスポート

錦田愛子

『パスポート学』 (北海道大学出版会)     215 - 218 2016.10

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work, Accepted

封鎖されたガザ地区に生きる人々――政治的孤立による人と物の移動の変化

錦田愛子

『日本の科学者』 (本の泉社)  51 ( 11 ) 18 - 23 2016.10

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work, Accepted

シリア・レバノンのパレスチナ人―安全と未来を求めて

錦田愛子

『パレスチナを知るための60章』 (明石書店)   2016.04

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work, Accepted

パレスチナ・ディアスポラ―繰り返される移動

錦田愛子

『パレスチナを知るための60章』 (明石書店)   2016.04

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work, Accepted

「アラブ諸国のパスポート」

NISHIKIDA Aiko

陳天璽・大西広之・小森宏美・佐々木てる編『パスポート学』北海道大学出版会 なし   47 - 51 2016

Single Work

解説「映画　シリアの花嫁――越えられない境界線」

NISHIKIDA Aiko

『ワールド・シネマ・スタディーズ――世界の「いま」を映画から考えよう』小長谷有紀・鈴木紀・旦匡子編、勉誠出版 なし   45 - 52 2016

Single Work

書評『グローバル時代の難民』

NISHIKIDA Aiko

図書新聞 3243   3 2016

Single Work

「見えない境界をめぐるパレスチナとイスラエルの攻防―国家承認、エルサレム、和平分割案」

NISHIKIDA Aiko

JCAS公開シンポジウム報告書『境界・境域への挑戦と「地域」』 1   18 - 25 2016

Single Work

「移民／難民とパスポート」

NISHIKIDA Aiko

陳天璽・大西広之・小森宏美・佐々木てる編『パスポート学』北海道大学出版会 なし   215 - 218 2016

Single Work

「パレスチナ・ディアスポラ―繰り返される移動」

NISHIKIDA Aiko

臼杵陽編、『パレスチナを知るための60章』明石書店 なし   23 - 26 2016

Single Work

「シリア・レバノンのパレスチナ人―安全と未来を求めて」

NISHIKIDA Aiko

臼杵陽編、『パレスチナを知るための60章』明石書店 なし   240 - 243 2016

Single Work

「オスロ合意と難民問題」

錦田愛子

『オスロ合意から２０年――パレスチナ／イスラエルの変容と課題』 (NIHUイスラーム地域研究東京大学拠点中東パレスチナ研究班)     39 - 55 2015.03

Research paper (conference, symposium, etc.), Single Work

「紛争とともに住むこと　―イスラエルとパレスチナの境界―」

錦田愛子

堀内正樹編『＜断＞と＜続＞の中東─非境界的世界を游ぐ─』 (悠書館)   2015.03

Research paper (other academic), Single Work

“Multidisciplinary Research on Cross-Border Arab Migration: A Comparison between Sweden and Jordan.”

Aiko NISHIKIDA, Ken SHIMIZU, Shingo HAMANAKA, Yutaka TAKAOKA, Masaki MIZOBUCHI

Asia and Africa across Disciplinary and National Lines, Proceedings of the Papers.    65 - 70 2015.03

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work, Accepted

ハマースをめぐる政治とガザ戦争

錦田愛子

『中東研究』  ( 522 ) 86 - 95 2015.01

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work, Accepted

オスロ合意と難民問題

NISHIKIDA Aiko

オスロ合意から２０年――パレスチナ／イスラエルの変容と課題 なし   39 - 55 2015

Single Work

パレスチナ――ハマース否定が導いた政治的混乱

錦田愛子

『「アラブの心臓」に何が起きているのか――現代中東の実像』 (岩波書店)   2014.12

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work, Accepted

The 2006 PLC Election and Hamas's Foreign Policy

NISHIKIDA Aiko

International Relations (JAPAN ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS)  2014 ( 177 ) 98 - 112 2014.10

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work, Accepted,  ISSN  0454-2215

　View Summary

The results of the PLC (Palestinian Legislative Council) election in January 2006 surprised international society with the ascension of Hamas as the ruling party. It was the first national election that Hamas officially participated in, but it succeeded in attracting votes as an alternative to Fatah—the dominant party of the PLO since the liberation movement began. The rise to power of Hamas made Israel, the EU and the United States anxious about its foreign policy, and compelled them to impose severe economic sanctions on the new government. As a result, the inauguration of the new government changed the geo-political map of the region.<br>This article focuses on this change, and investigates the relationship between the governmental change and its new foreign policy. Special attention is paid to Hamas as an Islamic party and its response to national and international politics. How has its ascension affected the relationship between it as a governing party and international society? What kind of foreign policy does the Islamic party envision for the future of the conflict with Israel? What has been the impact of the international reaction on internal politics? These questions will be answered in this paper.<br>The first section deals with the results of the PLC election and clarifies the reasons for Hamas's success in 2006. Several factors are pointed to as contributing to this, including its grassroots support, the rivalry with Fatah, and Fatah's failure in its electoral strategy. The second section illustrates the reaction by international society to the ascension of the Hamas as an Islamic party. The conditions presented to it by Israel and the Quartet for the lifting of sanctions are detailed. In comparison to these conditions, Hamas's position on conflict resolution and negotiation is studied by analyzing its charter and statements. In addition, its concept for peace talks—cease fire—is investigated. The last section discusses the diplomacy of the Hamas government after the economic sanctions were imposed. The support from Russia and Iran, and its limits, and the changed regional geopolitics are explained. In reflecting on the diplomatic situation, the attempt at reconciliation between Hamas and Fatah, and its institutional disturbance is also investigated in this section.<br>The rise of Islamic parties has become a commonplace phenomenon in the contemporary Middle East. The case of Hamas can be evaluated as a precedent for this, and the analysis of the logic, the interaction with internal politics, and the influence of international society should be investigated as a significant historical reference point. The study will suggest possible courses of action in diplomacy.

• Access to Document (DOI)