NOMURA Koji

写真a

Affiliation

Research Centers and Institutes, Keio Economic Observatory ( Mita )

Position

Professor

E-mail Address

E-mail address

Related Websites

External Links

Career 【 Display / hide 】

  • 1996.04
    -
    2003.03

    Keio University,, Keio Economic Observatory,, Assistant Professor

  • 2003.04
    -
    2005.03

    Harvard University,, Kennedy School of Government,, CBG fellow

  • 2003.04
    -
    2017.03

    Keio University,, Keio Economic Observatory,, Associate Professor

  • 2005.07
    -
    2008.09

    Cabinet Office, Government of Japan,, ESRI (Economic Social Research Institute),, Visiting Fellow

  • 2006.11
    -
    2007.08

    OECD, STI (Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry),, Economist

display all >>

Academic Background 【 Display / hide 】

  • 1989.03

    Hakodate Chubu High School, Hokkaido

    Graduated

  • 1993.03

    Keio University, Faculty of Business and Commerce

    University, Graduated

  • 1995.03

    Keio University, Graduate School of Business and Commerce

    Graduate School, Completed, Master's course

  • 1998.03

    Keio University, Graduate School of Business and Commerce

    Graduate School, Withdrawal after completion of doctoral course requirements, Doctoral course

Academic Degrees 【 Display / hide 】

  • M.A., Keio University, Coursework, 1995.03

  • Ph.D, Keio University, Dissertation, 2005

 

Research Areas 【 Display / hide 】

  • Humanities & Social Sciences / Economic statistics

  • Humanities & Social Sciences / Economic policy

Research Keywords 【 Display / hide 】

  • Economic Growth, Capital and Productivity

  • Energy and Environment

  • Labor Input and Human Capital

  • Japanese and Asian Economies

 

Books 【 Display / hide 】

  • APO Productivity Databook 2026

    Koji Nomura and Mun S. Ho, Asian Productivity Organization, Keio University Press, 2026.09,  Page: 207

     View Summary

    The 19th edition of the APO Productivity Databook provides standardized productivity and growth comparisons across 38 Asian economies and selected global reference economies over the period 1970–2024, with projections extending to 2035. Based on harmonized statistical concepts and internationally comparable methodologies, it evaluates Asia’s structural transformation, growth and productivity trends, and long-term development prospects. It also examines trade reconfiguration under geopolitical and policy shocks, energy prices and industrial competitiveness, and the relationship between AI and productivity. Productivity enhancement is defined as either increasing output from a given level of inputs or maintaining or expanding output while reducing resource use. As the indispensable foundation of resilient, sustained economic growth, improving national productivity remains a fundamental policy imperative. The Databook presents indicators of economic growth and labor productivity for 38 Asian economies (Asia38), comprising the 21 APO member economies (APO21) together with 17 non-member economies. For a subset of 28 economies (Asia28)—the APO21 plus Afghanistan, Bhutan, Brunei, China, the Maldives, Myanmar, and Saudi Arabia—it develops full productivity accounts, including capital and labor inputs and total factor productivity (TFP), covering approximately 94% of the region’s output in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms in 2024. The 2026 edition expands the coverage of labor productivity indicators from Asia33 to Asia38 by adding the Central Asian Five—Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan—and extends the full productivity accounts from Asia27 to Asia28 by incorporating Saudi Arabia. It also incorporates major national accounts benchmark revisions in seven economies while ensuring consistency across the long-term series. In addition, the United States (US), Australia, the European Union (EU), France, Germany, Italy, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom (UK) are included as reference economies.

  • Hydropower-Led Economic Growth in Bhutan: Development of Industry-Level Productivity Account, 1990–2022

    Koji Nomura, Contemporary South Asian Studies, Springer, 2025.05,  Page: 259

     View Summary

    This book provides a comprehensive analysis of Bhutan’s economic growth and productivity dynamics from 1990 to 2022, with a special focus on hydropower development. Through the construction of detailed industry-level productivity accounts, the study addresses significant data gaps in Bhutan’s national accounts, measuring outputs and inputs across various sectors and developing quality-adjusted labor and capital input series. The analysis reveals the complexities of Bhutan’s hydropower-led growth strategy: while the sector has driven substantial economic growth, its contribution to overall productivity improvement has been limited. The electricity sector shows gains in labor productivity but declining capital productivity, resulting in stagnant Total Factor Productivity (TFP). The study also examines productivity trends in non-electricity sectors and addresses potential “Dutch disease” effects on manufacturing and agricultural competitiveness. International comparisons place Bhutan’s productivity performance in a regional context, revealing significant gaps in productivity performance, particularly when compared to India, Bhutan’s largest trading partner and a regional economic benchmark. This comparative analysis informs policy recommendations for achieving more balanced and sustainable economic growth. The findings are particularly relevant for Bhutan’s Thirteenth Five-Year Plan (2024–2029), which emphasizes productivity improvements across all economic sectors. The book serves as a valuable resource for policymakers, economists, and researchers interested in development economics, particularly those focused on the unique challenges faced by small, landlocked nations pursuing sustainable economic development.

  • Energy Productivity and Economic Growth: Experiences of the Japanese Industries, 1955–2019

    Koji Nomura, Springer, 2023.01,  Page: 268

     View Summary

    Energy costs in the economy amount to only a few percent of gross domestic product, but their importance to economic growth is much greater than their apparent number. Energy is used in almost all production and consumption activities, and energy price changes induce significant spillover effects throughout the economic system. More importantly, stable and affordable access to energy is a critical factor in determining the rate of capital accumulation in a domestic economy and, hence, labor productivity growth. The expansion of production per hour worked is achieved by using more and higher quality capital, which requires more energy to operate. This book aims to provide robust observational facts on energy productivity improvement (EPI) and to analyze the mechanisms of EPI achieved in Japan’s economic growth from 1955 to 2019. Linking the productivity account with energy statistics enables us to attempt not only to develop a better indicator of energy productivity but also to evaluate the EPI with other significant changes in the production process, such as capital productivity, labor productivity, and even the overall efficiency measured in terms of total factor productivity. This book is a valuable resource for researchers and policymakers seeking to understand the role of energy throughout the economy and for economic planners seeking to ensure the efficient use of energy now and into the future.

  • Energy Productivity in Japan's Economic Growth: Exploring Possibilities for Balancing Economy and Environment (in Japanese)

    Koji Nomura, Keio University Press, 2021.06,  Page: 288

     View Summary

    This book reexamines the sources of Japan’s long-term economic stagnation from the perspectives of energy constraints and productivity. Although energy appears as a relatively small cost component in GDP, it constitutes a fundamental input underpinning capital utilization and labor productivity. Its price level and supply structure therefore exert a substantial influence on medium- to long-term economic growth.

    Using long-term data covering the period since 1885 at the macro level and since 1955 at the industry level, the book analyzes the dynamics of energy productivity (EPI). It develops a productivity accounting framework that integrates energy quality, industrial structure, and technological change. In addition, by employing indicators such as the real unit energy cost (RUEC) and the effective import dependency of electricity (EID), the book examines Japan’s resilience to energy price changes and its structural vulnerabilities in an international comparative context.

    The empirical findings suggest that recent energy and environmental policies in Japan, rather than promoting growth through improvements in energy productivity, may have constrained economic growth by suppressing capital accumulation and slowing total factor productivity (TFP) growth. The book concludes by redefining the conditions under which economic growth and environmental policy can be reconciled, and provides a foundation for designing effective energy policies.

  • "Technological Innovation and the Divergence of the Japanese Economy" (in Japanese)

    Koji Nomura, Nikkei Business Publications, Inc., 2026.10

     View Summary

    Using SBI-BIP, this chapter portrays the Japanese economy of 2040 along two scenarios: a Business-as-Usual (BaU) path extending current trends, and a Technology and Societal Implementation (TSI) path in which the societal implementation of technological innovation advances. It analyzes the sources of growth under TSI—where nominal GDP reaches approximately ¥1,000 trillion—and its consequences for employment, income distribution, AI utilization, and energy constraints, showing that realizing this potential depends not on technological progress alone but also on the economic and social foundations that support its implementation.

display all >>

Papers 【 Display / hide 】

  • "Technological Innovation and the Divergence of the Japanese Economy" (in Japanese)

    Koji Nomura

    政井 貴子・増島 稔・SBI金融経済研究所編『2040年の日本再生 進化系フィジタル経済の衝撃』 (Nikkei Business Publications, Inc.)   2026.10

    Part of collection (book), Single Work

     View Summary

    Using SBI-BIP, this chapter portrays the Japanese economy of 2040 along two scenarios: a Business-as-Usual (BaU) path extending current trends, and a Technology and Societal Implementation (TSI) path in which the societal implementation of technological innovation advances. It analyzes the sources of growth under TSI—where nominal GDP reaches approximately ¥1,000 trillion—and its consequences for employment, income distribution, AI utilization, and energy constraints, showing that realizing this potential depends not on technological progress alone but also on the economic and social foundations that support its implementation.

  • "Two Uncertainties—Energy Transition and the Choices Facing the Japanese Economy" (in Japanese)

    Koji Nomura

    政井 貴子・増島 稔・SBI金融経済研究所編『2040年の日本再生 進化系フィジタル経済の衝撃』 (Nikkei Business Publications, Inc.)   2026.10

    Part of collection (book), Single Work

     View Summary

    This chapter reviews the history of policymaking on low-carbon development and decarbonization, examining distortions in economic and technological assessments and the uncertainty that remains in their scientific basis. Under the “two uncertainties” of climate change and the energy transition, it argues for the importance of not betting on any single path and of keeping diverse options open.

  • "Decarbonization Outcomes at Institutional Seams: Non-Identification and Selection in the Rebuilding of Kourakuen’s Asaka Store as a ZEB Ready Building" (in Japanese)

    Koji Nomura

    KEO Discussion Paper (Keio Economic Observatory, Keio University)   ( 206 ) 1 - 44 2026.07

    Research paper (bulletin of university, research institution), Single Work

     View Summary

    This paper examines the rebuilding of Kourakuen’s Asaka Store, a ramen restaurant in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, as a ZEB Ready building, as reported in July 2026. Using publicly available primary sources—including real estate registration records, building confirmation documents, municipal budgets, and corporate disclosures—it reconstructs the conditions under which this case came to circulate as a decarbonization policy “achievement.” Neither national nor Fukushima Prefectural subsidies covered a small, newly constructed ZEB Ready building of this type, and the Koriyama City subsidy is unlikely to have induced the initial investment decision. The road-widening project explains the opportunity and timing of the rebuilding, but not the adoption of the ZEB Ready specification. The project combined a small scale, which could limit total incremental costs, with the publicity, learning, and rollout value associated with a store in a restaurant chain. For Tohoku Electric Power, the expected value of early market entry, learning, and the formation of a first-project track record may also justify its involvement as the ZEB Planner. Yet land and building ownership, construction, operation, and ZEB support were divided among multiple parties, while cost sharing, contractual relationships, and service remuneration were not disclosed. The economic arrangement that satisfied the parties’ participation constraints therefore cannot be identified.
    This non-identification arises from institutional design. The ZEB system records compliance with a design-based technical standard within a prescribed assessment boundary, but does not link outcome information to operating performance, financing and contractual relationships, counterfactual benchmarks, or cost incidence. Actual energy savings, private viability under ordinary market conditions, policy additionality, and replicability across projects therefore cannot be verified. At the institutional seam created by this informational disconnect, a “decarbonization achievement” is generated through two stages of selection. In the inner selection, project-specific opportunities and benefits allow the relevant parties’ participation constraints to be satisfied, thereby forming a ZEB Ready project. In the outer selection, projects with symbolic attributes—such as first-of-its-kind status or regional collaboration—are made visible through corporate announcements and media coverage. Narratives emphasizing technical achievement and inter-organizational collaboration while omitting project-specific formation histories may thereby bias public perceptions of policy effects.
    Appropriate policy evaluation requires examining the incentives that outcome indicators and subsidy-eligibility categories create for project and technology choices, while establishing a recordkeeping system that links project formation histories, public support, financing sources, related-party relationships, and post-completion operating performance to building-level outcome information. Additional resources committed by private actors in response to policy incentives should also be recognized as policy costs arising outside the fiscal process, and their incidence should be assessed.

  • "Productivity Dynamics in the Maldives: Evidence from the Maldivian Productivity Accounts, 1970–2024"

    Koji Nomura

    (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific)   2026.06

    Research paper (other academic), Single Work

     View Summary

    This report develops the Maldivian Productivity Accounts (MVPA 2026) and examines the sources of economic growth and productivity dynamics over 1970–2024. Growth accounting and comparisons with other South Asian economies and Fiji reveal that the Maldives’ rapid economic expansion has been driven primarily by capital accumulation and labor input growth, with limited sustained improvement in total factor productivity (TFP). Despite broadly stable long-run capital productivity, the recent sharp increase in the capital–output ratio raises questions about capital utilization, investment returns, and debt sustainability. The analysis also highlights substantial TFP volatility associated with tourism demand and external shocks, the structural role of foreign workers, and limited long-run real wage growth. The findings underscore the importance of improving investment efficiency, strengthening human capital development and retention, and establishing a continuously updated productivity-accounting framework to support evidence-based policymaking.

  • "Bhutanese Productivity Accounts 2026: Industry-Level Productivity Trends, 1990–2024"

    Koji Nomura

    (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific)   2026.05

    Research paper (other academic), Single Work

     View Summary

    This report develops industry-level productivity accounts for Bhutan over 1990–2024 and examines the long-term sources of economic growth and productivity change. In 2024, Bhutan experienced a broad-based economic recovery, including strong growth in manufacturing, accompanied by an improvement in productivity following the COVID-19 pandemic. Over the longer term, large-scale hydropower investment has supported remarkable labor productivity growth, while capital productivity has declined and total factor productivity (TFP) has remained largely stagnant. Despite its substantial contribution to economic growth, hydropower development has generated limited productivity spillovers to other industries. Sustained growth will require more effective capital utilization, industrial diversification, and manufacturing development supported by reliable and affordable electricity.

display all >>

Papers, etc., Registered in KOARA 【 Display / hide 】

display all >>

Reviews, Commentaries, etc. 【 Display / hide 】

display all >>

Presentations 【 Display / hide 】

  • "How Will Technological Implementation Transform Economic Structures?—Visualization Using BIP and Future Visions for BIP" (in Japanese)

    Koji Nomura

    [Domestic presentation]  "Reseach on Japanese Economy in 2040", 

    2026.03
    , 

    Oral presentation (general), SBI Financial and Economic Research Institute

  • "Declining Energy Cost Competitiveness in Japan and Europe" (in Japanese)

    Koji Nomura

    [Domestic presentation]  RITE ALPS IV Economic Analysis Working Group, 

    2026.03
    , 

    Oral presentation (general), RITE

     View Summary

    This report examines the international comparison of energy cost competitiveness, emphasizing the importance of evaluating energy prices using a real price level index based on value-added prices (Real PLI) rather than nominal price differences that depend on exchange rates. Using data for nine economies—Japan, China, Korea, India, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, and the United States—measured through the fourth quarter of 2025, the analysis confirms that since the post-pandemic period the real energy price gap faced by Japan, Korea, and European economies relative to the United States, China, and India has structurally widened and become increasingly persistent. Japan’s Real PLI reaches 2.08 times that of the United States, while Germany’s reaches 2.73 times.

    The study further estimates a threshold effect whereby production in energy-intensive and trade-exposed (EITE) industries declines nonlinearly once the energy price gap exceeds a certain critical level. The recent improvement in measured energy productivity observed in advanced economies therefore reflects not only gains in technical efficiency but also significant structural change associated with the hollowing out of EITE industries. This dynamic implies the emergence of new risks for economic security in energy-dependent industrial economies.

  • "How Does the Social Implementation of Technological Innovation Transform the Japanese Economy? —Visualizing Structural Change with the High-Resolution Economic Model BIP?" (in Japanese)

    Koji Nomura

    [Domestic presentation]  RITE ALPS IV , 

    2026.01
    , 

    Oral presentation (general), RITE

  • "Economic Growth, Electricity Consumption, and CO2 Emissions Accompanying the Social Implementation of Technological Innovation: An Evaluation Using the High-Resolution Economic Model BIP" (in Japanese)

    Koji Nomura

    [Domestic presentation]  RITE ALPS IV Economic Analysis Working Group, 

    2025.12
    , 

    Oral presentation (general), RITE

  • "Social Implementation of Technological Innovation in the 2040 Economy and Society: An Evaluation Using the High-Resolution Economic Model BIP" (in Japanese)

    Koji Nomura

    [Domestic presentation]  "Reseach on Japanese Economy in 2040", 

    2025.12
    , 

    Oral presentation (general), SBI Financial and Economic Research Institute

display all >>

Works 【 Display / hide 】

  • APO Productivity Database (APO-PDB) 2027

    Koji Nomura, Sho Inaba, and Shiori Nakayama

    Asian Productivity Organization and Keio Economic Observatory, 

    2026.10
    -
    2027.06
    , 

    Database science, Joint

     View Details

    The APO Productivity Database (APO-PDB) is a macro-level productivity account covering mainly Asian economies, incorporating changes in labor composition and capital inputs including land, inventories, and natural resources. It traces economic growth across Asia from 1970 to the most recent year — spanning more than half a century — constructed based on internationally harmonized SNA concepts.

    The Asia Quality-adjusted Labor Input Database (AQALI) 2027 and the Asia Natural Resources Database (ANRD) 2027 will be utilized in the APO-PDB2026, scheduled for publication in September 2027. The measurement coverage spans the period from 1970 to 2025.

    The APO-PDB 2027 includes 28 Asian economies—Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, Chinese Taipei, Fiji, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Lao People's Democratic Republic, Malaysia, Mongolia, Myanmar, Nepal, the Maldives, Pakistan, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Turkey, Bhutan, Brunei, and Viet Nam—as well as the United States.

  • Asia Quality-adjusted Labor Input Database (AQALI) 2027

    Koji Nomura, Sho Inaba, and Shiori Nakayama

    Keio Economic Observatory, Keio University, 

    2026.10
    -
    2027.06
    , 

    Database science, Joint

     View Details

    The AQALI 2027 is utilized in the APO Productivity Databook 2027 (to be published in September 2027). The measurement covers from 1970 to 2025.

    It includes 28 Asian economies—Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, Chinese Taipei, Fiji, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Lao People's Democratic Republic, Malaysia, Mongolia, Myanmar, Nepal, the Maldives, Pakistan, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Turkey, Bhutan, Brunei, and Viet Nam—as well as the United States.

  • Energy Cost Monitoring for Japan (ECM_JPN_202610)

    Koji Nomura and Sho Inaba

    Nomura Lab at Keio Economic Observatory, 

    2026.10
    , 

    Database science, Joint

     View Details

    ECM monitors international disparities in real energy costs across nine countries — Japan, China, South Korea, India, the United States, France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom — publishing high-frequency estimates of the Real Unit Energy Cost (RUEC) and the Real Price Level Index (Real PLI). The Japan-specific component provides monthly estimates of real energy costs and identifies the effects of energy subsidies. In addition, production and import indices for energy-intensive and trade-exposed (EITE) manufacturing industries affected by energy price surges and environmental policies are measured and published with international comparisons.

  • Multilateral Energy Cost Monitoring (ECM_202610)

    Koji Nomura and Sho Inaba

    Keio Economic Observatory, Keio University, 

    2026.10
    , 

    Database science, Joint

     View Details

    The ECM provides a high-frequency indicator — Real Unit Energy Cost (RUEC) and Real Price Level Index for energy (Real PLI) — to measure and compare real energy cost differentials across nine countries: four in Asia (China, India, Japan, and Korea), and four in Europe (France, Germany, Italy, and the UK), and the U.S. The ECM also releases the EITE (Energy-Intensive Trade-Exposed) Output Index.

  • Monthly GDP Growth (JMGDP_202610)

    Koji Nomura and Sho Inaba

    Nomura Lab at Keio Economic Observatory, 

    2026.10
    , 

    Database science, Joint

     View Details

    JMGDP is a monthly GDP estimate for Japan developed and published by the Nomura Lab at the Keio Economic Observatory (KEO), Keio University. It features a production-side approach across 36 industries with double-deflation-based value-added estimation, offering a perspective on economic conditions distinct from the expenditure-based official statistics. Estimates are released around the end of each month with an approximate one-month lag behind the reference period, and have been published continuously since October 2022. A quarterly counterpart, JQGDP, is also available, enabling direct comparison with the Cabinet Office's JSNA quarterly estimates.
    JMGDP_202610 is updated through September 2026.

display all >>

Awards 【 Display / hide 】

  • The 48th Nikkei Award (Nikkei Keizai-Tosho-Bunka-Sho)

    Koji Nomura, 2005.11, Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Measurement of Capital and Productivity

    Type of Award: Award from publisher, newspaper, foundation, etc.

  • Keio Award

    Koji Nomura, 2005.11, Keio Univeristy

    Type of Award: Keio commendation etc.

 

Courses Taught 【 Display / hide 】

  • INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS

    2026

  • INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS

    2026

  • THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS

    2026

  • SEMINAR: SPECIAL STUDY OF ECONOMETRICS

    2026

  • SPECIAL STUDY OF ECONOMETRICS

    2026

display all >>

 

Social Activities 【 Display / hide 】

  • やさしい経済学「エネルギーコストを考える」(全10回)

    日本経済新聞社, 日本経済新聞, 

    , 
    2026.10
    -
    2026.11
  • 「国際情勢から見る日本のエネルギーと経済の未来」

    北海道エナジートーク, 北海道エナジートーク21 (ニューオータニイン札幌)

    , 
    2026.10
  • "Thinking About the World Economy: What Changes, What Remains the Same" (in Japanese)

    品川三田会 第28回定期総会 (慶應義塾大学 三田キャンパス)

    , 
    2026.10
  • "What Impact Will Decarbonization Policies Have? — The Japanese Economy Guided by ‘Rhetoric’” "

    食の信頼向上をめざす会, 

    , 
    2026.09
  • Publication of “Energy Monitor”

    Keio Economic Observatory, Keio University, Energy Monitor, 

    , 
    2026.08

     View Summary

    Energy Monitor (EM) is a newsletter that provides an overview of energy costs, supply and demand, and industry trends in major countries.

display all >>

Media Coverage 【 Display / hide 】

display all >>

Academic Activities 【 Display / hide 】

  • Development and Dissemination of Productivity Research Notes (PRN), 2026–

    Keio Economic Observatory, Keio University, 

    2026.03

     View Summary

    Productivity Research Notes (PRN) is a series of concise analytical briefs, each designed as a self-contained analysis typically presented in a two-page format, produced by the Keio Economic Observatory (KEO), Keio University, Tokyo, focusing on productivity and economic performance in Asia. It highlights key measurement issues, empirical findings, and policy-relevant insights, and serves as a platform to communicate selected results from the APO Productivity Databook/Database and related research activities at KEO, including APDB, AQALI, ANRD, ECM, and related analytical resources.

  • Development of Augmented Productivity Database (APDB) 2026, 1970–2024

    Keio Economic Observatory, Keio University, 

    2025.10
    -
    2026.09

  • Development of Augmented Productivity Database (APDB) 2025, 1970–2023

    Keio Economic Observatory, Keio University, 

    2024.10
    -
    2025.09

  • UNESCAP Project- Development of Growth Accounting Framework for Bhutan

    Ministry of Finance and Keio Economic Observatory,  (Ministry of Finance, Royal Government of Bhutan, and KEO, Keio University) , 

    2024.09
    -
    2024.12

display all >>

Committee Experiences 【 Display / hide 】

  • 2026.11
    -
    2027.01

    Consultant, UNESCAP (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific)

  • 2026.06
    -
    2026.09

    Committee Member, Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth (RITE), Technical Committee for International Strategy against Global Warming

  • 2026.06
    -
    2026.09

    Committee Member, Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth (RITE), Working Group for Promoting Innovation and Investment

  • 2026.06
    -
    2026.09

    Chief, Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth (RITE), Economic Analysis Working Group

  • 2026.04
    -
    2027.03

    Editorial Board Member, "Economic Analysis" Editorial Board, Economic and Social Research Institute, Cabinet Office, Government of Japan

display all >>