Takata, Kenji

写真a

Affiliation

Law School (Mita)

Position

Professor

External Links

Career 【 Display / hide

  • 2000.04
    -
    2003.03

    Hokkai-Gakuen University, 法学部, 講師

  • 2003.04
    -
    2004.03

    Kwansei Gakuin University, School of Law and Politics, 専任講師

  • 2004.04
    -
    2007.03

    大阪市立大学, 大学院法学研究科, 助教授

  • 2007.04
    -
    2014.03

    大阪市立大学, 大学院法学研究科, 准教授

  • 2014.04
    -
    2018.08

    大阪市立大学, 大学院法学研究科, 教授

display all >>

Academic Background 【 Display / hide

  • 1990.04
    -
    1994.03

    Osaka City University, Faculty of Law

  • 1994.04
    -
    1997.03

    Osaka City University, Graduate School, Division of Law

  • 1997.04
    -
    2000.03

    Osaka City University, 大学院法学研究科後期博士課程

 

Research Areas 【 Display / hide

  • Humanities & Social Sciences / Civil law (Insolvency Law)

  • Humanities & Social Sciences / Civil law

Research Keywords 【 Display / hide

  • Insolvency Law

 

Books 【 Display / hide

  • 破産管財人制度論

    高田 賢治, 有斐閣, 2012.03,  Page: xv, 209p

  • 逐条解説会社法6

    上村達男ほか編, 中央経済社, 2020.04

  • 続・争点倒産実務の諸問題

    倒産実務交流会編, 青林書院, 2019

  • 倒産法

    倉部 真由美, 高田 賢治, 上江洲 純子, 有斐閣, 2018.12,  Page: xiv, 268p

  • 動産債権担保 : 比較法のマトリクス

    池田 真朗, 中島 弘雅, 森田 修 編, 商事法務, 2015.08,  Page: xviii, 580p

display all >>

Papers 【 Display / hide

  • 破産債権の金銭化と清算価値保障原則

    高田 賢治

    関西法律特許事務所編『民事特別法の諸問題〔第6巻〕』(関西法律特許事務所開設55周年記念論文集)(関西法律特許事務所)    411 - 435 2020

  • 仮想通貨交換業者の倒産手続におけるビットコイン返還請求権の処遇

    高田 賢治

    慶應法学  ( 42 ) 259 - 287 2019

  • 除斥原因から考える忌避事由―金沢地決平成28年3月31日

    高田 賢治

    加藤哲夫ほか編『現代民事手続の法理』(上野泰男先生古稀祝賀論文集)(弘文堂)    37 - 51 2017

  • 個人再生手続における清算価値の基準時

    高田 賢治

    山本克己ほか編『民事手続法の現代的課題と理論的解明』(徳田和幸先生古稀祝賀論文集)(弘文堂)    813 - 827 2017

  • イギリス企業倒産手続の担い手―裁判所を中心に

    高田 賢治

    佐藤鉄男=中西正編著『倒産処理プレーヤーの役割』(民事法研究会)    362 - 386 2017

display all >>

Papers, etc., Registered in KOARA 【 Display / hide

Reviews, Commentaries, etc. 【 Display / hide

display all >>

Presentations 【 Display / hide

Research Projects of Competitive Funds, etc. 【 Display / hide

  • Insolvecy proceedings and Professionals

    2013.04
    -
    2016.03

    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, Sato Tetsuo, NAKANISHI Masashi, FUJIMOTO Toshikazu, MATSUSHITA Yuuki, MIZUMOTO Hironori, NATSUI Yoshihiro, TAKATA Kenji, KURABE Mayumi, JIN Chun, SUGIMOTO Kazushi, KITAJIMA Noriko, SUGIMOTO Junko, TAMAI Hiroki, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B), No Setting

     View Summary

    We have tried to think about Insolvency Practitioner(IP) from historical point and comparative point, particularly,insolvency court, insolvency lawyer, debtor and creditor. As time went by, the role of Insolvency Practitioner has changed. We can understand that the role of Insolvency Practitioner is influenced by the purpose of insolvemcy proceedings.

  • Study of security interests and business rehabilitation in the age of Asset Based Lending

    2012.04
    -
    2016.03

    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, Takata Kenji, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C), No Setting

     View Summary

    I show that the general interests of creditors means not only best interest but also the others. I study the best interest test. The test is that debtors can go corporate reorganization proceedings when they can pay more money than that in bankruptcy liquidation. But I discuss that we have to consider the features of the rehabilitation act if we use the best interest test and that the court may confirm the plan which is under the liquidation value when most of creditors support it.
    I study Asset Based Lending in England. I show the following features. The first is that floating charge is less priority than fixed charge. The second is that there is the subscribed part for unsecured creditors. The last is that a secured creditor manage to protect their interests under that circumstance.

  • Survey and empirical study on the Civil Rehabilitation Act

    2010.04
    -
    2013.03

    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, YAMAMOTO KEN, YAMAMOTO Kazuhiko, FUJIMOTO Toshikazu, KONDOH Takashi, HATA Hiroki, UEZU Junko, JIN Chun, MORI Madoka, NATSUI Yoshihiro, TAKATA Kenji, SUGIMOTO Kazushi, SUGIMOTO Junko, KURABE Mayumi, TANAKA Wataru, KAWASAKI Yuko, KIGAWA Yuichiro, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B), No Setting

     View Summary

    ON this study, we conducted a fact-finding survey of records of Civil Rehabilitation Cases and tried to analyze the data obtained by the survey. We have carried out the survey at 4 District Courts (Tokyo District Court, Osaka District Court, Sendai District Court, and Naha District Court). In analyzing the data, we have compared the data from the viewpoints of regions, periods, and compared with the practical operations of the Composition Act. On that basis, we have analyzed the data on 13 aspects we picked up.

  • Comparative study of the law of corporate rescue and priorities of claims in the age of the security over all of property

    2009
    -
    2011

    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, TAKATA Kenji, Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B), No Setting

     View Summary

    Creditors can have security over all of debtors' property. What is the aim of Insolvency proceedings which save the general creditors equally, if it is popular? I studied the UK insolvency law from the point of view of corporate rescue and priority of claim. As a result, UK law introduced the ring fence for general creditors and reformed the administrative receivership from for secured creditors to both of secured creditors and general creditors. I found that the objective of the law reform was corporate rescue.

  • Cross-sectional Studies of Secured Interests, Execution and Bankruptcy Law

    2002
    -
    2003

    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, SEGAWA Nobuhisa, FUJIWARA Masanori, OGAWA Kozo, TAKAMI Susumu, TAKATA Kenji, FUKUDA Seiji, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C), No Setting

     View Summary

    This research aimed to investigate the background of recent reforms of security interests law, execution law and bankruptcy law, and establish (clarify) cross-sectional pricples underlying these legal fields and made some proposals for legislation and legal practice.
    The research results are to be summarized in three points which turn (hinge) on the recent movement of diversification and speeding up of the process of execution and bankruptcy procedures.
    1.The first concerns the importance of the extra-judiciary procedures for diversification and streamlinig of the process of the execution and bankruptcy. Besides M & A in U.S., in France, the notaires and commissaire-priseurs developed the procedures such as la vente aimable, la conversion de la saisie en vente volontaire, l'ordre amiable, l'ordre consensuel etc.
    2.The third concerns the importance of those who manage the execution and bankruptcy. Besides the court officials, investment bankers, accountants, tax accountants and lawyers play very imprtant roles for diversification and streamlinig of the process inm U.S.and recent Japan. Noteworthy is also the introduction of the Insolvency Practitioners in England in 1986.
    3.The second is the weakening or restructuring of some secured interests in diversified and speeded up procedures of execution and bankruptcy. The question is double. The first question is how far weaken the secured interests against the creditors, the second is how far weaken the transactional creditors among whom wages employees and contractors are practically important, against the financial creditors.

 

Courses Taught 【 Display / hide

  • RESEARCH THEME

    2024

  • RESEARCH PAPER

    2024

  • JOINT SEMINAR: CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE 2

    2024

  • JOINT SEMINAR: CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE 1

    2024

  • CIVIL PROCEDURE II

    2024

display all >>

 

Memberships in Academic Societies 【 Display / hide

  • 日本民事訴訟法学会, 

    1997.08
    -
    Present

Committee Experiences 【 Display / hide

  • 2013.05
    -
    2016.05

    理事, 日本民事訴訟法学会

  • 2004.05
    -
    2007.05

    理事, 日本民事訴訟法学会

     View Remarks

    日本民事訴訟法学会