論文 - 河添　仁

Change of the Blood Concentration of Tacrolimus after the Switch from Fluconazole to Voriconazole in Patients Receiving Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Kawazoe H, Takiguchi Y, Tanaka H, Fukuoka N, Ohnishi H, Ishida T, Houchi H

Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin （The Pharmaceutical Society of Japan）  29 （ 12 ） 2528 - 2531 2006年12月

研究論文（学術雑誌）, 共著, 筆頭著者, 責任著者, 査読有り

　概要を見る

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact by switching co-administered triazole antifungal agent from fluconazole (FCZ) to voriconazole (VCZ) on the blood concentration of tacrolimus (FK506) in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We performed a retrospective study presented as case reports. The blood concentration of FK506 was increased after the switch from FCZ to VCZ, resulting in increase of the concentration/dose (C/D) ratio of FK506. Thus, the mean C/D ratios of FK506 with oral administration was surprisingly increased over 4.5-fold after the switch. Therefore, it was necessary to reduce the FK506 dose when co-administered FCZ is switched to VCZ. We should be careful when interpreting the results of these case reports; however, in some patients, it is recommended that the dose of FK506 be reduced to one-fifth after the switch.

• Access to Document (DOI)

患者参加型癌化学療法副作用モニタリング—患者の治療参加と情報の共有化—

河添　仁, 久保智美, 飯原なおみ, 土居智明, 奥條真紀子, 福岡憲泰, 藤本さとし, 金地伸拓, 坂東修二, 石田俊彦, 滝口祥令, 芳地　一

Yakugaku Zasshi （(公社)日本薬学会）  126 （ 8 ） 629 - 642 2006年08月

研究論文（学術雑誌）, 共著, 筆頭著者, 責任著者, 査読有り

　概要を見る

The purpose of this study was to assess patient participation in cancer therapy and the sharing of patient information among the medical care team (physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and especially patients). We monitored the side effects of cancer chemotherapy with patients, and developed two support tools: One scored the points of subjective symptoms (fatigue, anorexia, nausea, etc) by patients, and the other recorded objective symptoms (clinical examination data) by pharmacists. It is most important that they attend each patient at their bedside. At this time, the trial was evaluated by questionnaire survey by inpatients receiving cancer chemotherapy (n=15). As a result, all patients (15/15) responded that this trial was necessary. This trial addressed the following: 1) increased communication between patients and medical staff concerning side effects (14/15), 2) increased interest in side effects (10/15), 3) when a patient tells medical staff about side effects, they act on it (10/15). None of the patients felt inconvenienced by scoring every day (0/15), or anxiety about side effects (0/15). Furthermore, all patients (15/15) responded that “participation of pharmacists in cancer chemotherapy” was necessary. This trial revealed no problems and suggested that patients related to the center of medical care. We should be careful in interpreting results of this small sized trial; however, the following conclusions should be reached: 1) introduction of monitoring side effects of cancer chemotherapy with patients, 2) develop communication among the medical care team.

• Access to Document (DOI)

診療報酬改訂に伴う「投与日数規制の原則廃止」の薬物療法管理に及ぼす影響

河添　仁, 飯原なおみ, 土居智明, 森田修之

Yakugaku Zasshi （(公社)日本薬学会）  125 （ 12 ） 959 - 969 2005年12月

研究論文（学術雑誌）, 共著, 筆頭著者, 査読有り

　概要を見る

The proclamation of April 2002 of a Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare ordinance has enabled doctors to prescribe drugs for an outpatient without a limit on the length of prescription terms except for a few drugs. There is a concern that the prescription-term deregulation could cause careless drug therapy management in order to extend the interval between patient hospital visits. The purpose of this study is to make pre- and post-deregulation comparisons of two items, prescription terms and implementation of clinical examination that complied with package-insert precautions, and to discuss the approaches to increase safety. Prescription terms have lengthened progressively. In the pre-regulation period of January to March 2002, the mean prescription term was 19.9 days; in the post-regulation period of July to September 2002, it was 24.9 days; and in July to September 2003, 28.6 days. Even for anti-tumor agents, there were prescriptions over 90 days after deregulation. There was no significant difference between the pre- and post-deregulation compliance ratios for the package-insert precautions in eight drugs of investigated nine. However, one case had a delay in detection of liver dysfunction, which was caused by deviation from the once-a-month testing indicated in the package-insert precautions for prolonged prescription terms. The evidence suggested that the deregulation led to negligent drug therapy management. To assure safe therapy, the following should be addressed: first, sufficient function of a computerized prescriber order entry system and second, creation of a new framework with pharmacists' active involvement such as collaborative therapy management with physicians.

• Access to Document (DOI)