KEIO RESEARCHERS INFORMATION SYSTEM

Career 【 Display / hide 】

Career 【 Display / hide 】

• 2013.04

  -

  2018.03

  東京学芸大学附属高等学校, 教諭

Academic Degrees 【 Display / hide 】

Academic Degrees 【 Display / hide 】

• 博士（医科学）, The University of Tokyo, Coursework, 2022.06

Research Keywords 【 Display / hide 】

Research Keywords 【 Display / hide 】

• 生命倫理　科学教育（生物教育）

Books 【 Display / hide 】

Books 【 Display / hide 】

• 改訂　新編生物基礎

  UCHIYAMA Masato, 東京書籍, 2017.04

Papers 【 Display / hide 】

Papers 【 Display / hide 】

• Public attitudes in the clinical application of genome editing on human embryos in Japan: a cross-sectional survey across multiple stakeholders

  Kobayashi S., Miyoshi T., Kobayashi T., Hayakawa I., Urayama K.Y., Uchiyama M., Muto K., Takeuchi Y., Taira M., Sago H., Takehara K.

  Journal of Human Genetics (Journal of Human Genetics)  67 ( 9 ) 541 - 546 2022

  ISSN  14345161

  　View Summary

  Recent advances in genome editing technology are accompanied by increasing public expectations on its potential clinical application, but there are still scientific, ethical, and social considerations that require resolution. In Japan, discussions pertaining to the clinical use of genome editing in human embryos are underway. However, understanding of the public’s sentiment and attitude towards this technology is limited which is important to help guide the debate for prioritizing policies and regulatory necessities. Thus, we conducted a cross-sectional study and administered an online questionnaire across three stakeholder groups: the general public, patients and their families, and health care providers. We received responses from a total of 3,511 individuals, and the attitudes were summarized and compared among the stakeholders. Based on the distribution of responses, health care providers tended to be cautious and reluctant about the clinical use of genome editing, while patients and families appeared supportive and positive. The majority of the participants were against the use of genome editing for enhancement purposes. Participants expressed the view that clinical use may be acceptable when genome editing is the fundamental treatment, the risks are negligible, and the safety of the technology is demonstrated in human embryos. Our findings suggest differences in attitudes toward the clinical use of genome editing across stakeholder groups. Taking into account the diversity of the public’s awareness and incorporating the opinion of the population is important. Further information dissemination and educational efforts are needed to support the formation of the public’s opinion.

  • Access to Document (DOI)

• A self-marker-like protein governs hemocyte allorecognition in Halocynthia roretzi

  Ema M., Okada T., Takahashi M., Uchiyama M., Kubo H., Moriyama H., Miyakawa H., Matsumoto M.

  Zoological Letters (Zoological Letters)  5 ( 1 ) 34 2019.12

  ISSN  2056-306X

  　View Summary

  © 2019 The Author(s). Background: Self-incompatibility, fusion/non-fusion reactions, and contact reactions (CRs) have all been identified as allorecognition phenomena in ascidians. CR is a reaction characteristic of the hemocytes of Halocynthia roretzi, whereby they release phenol oxidase (PO) upon contact with non-self hemocytes. Thus, these cells may represent a primitive form of the vertebrate immune system. In the present study, we focused on the CR of H. roretzi hemocytes and sought to identify self-marker proteins that distinguish between self and non-self cells. Results: We initially generated a CR-inducing monoclonal antibody against the complete hemocyte membrane-protein complement (mAb11B16B10). This antibody was identified based on the differential induction of PO activity in individual organisms. The level of PO activity induced by this antibody in individual ascidians was consistent with the observed CR-induced PO activity. mAb11B16B10 recognized a series of 12 spots corresponding to a 100-kDa protein, with differing isoelectric points (pIs). A comparison of the 2D electrophoresis gels of samples from CR-reactive/non-reactive individuals revealed that some spots in this series in hemocytes were common to the CR-non-inducible individuals, but not to CR-inducible individuals. We cloned the corresponding gene and named it Halocynthia roretzi self-marker-like protein-1 (HrSMLP1). This gene is similar to the glycoprotein DD3-3 found in Dictyostelium, and is conserved in invertebrates. Conclusion: We generated a CR-inducing monoclonal antibody (mAb11B16B10) that recognized a series of novel membrane proteins (HrSMLP1) in the hemocytes of H. roretzi. The combination of expressed spots of HrSMLP1 distinguishes non-self cells from self cells with respect to CR inducibility. Given that the HrSMLP1 gene is a single gene, it may represent a novel type of self-marker protein with a role in CR.

  • Access to Document (DOI)

• Survey on the perception of germline genome editing among the general public in Japan

  UCHIYAMA MasatoAkiko NagaiKaori Muto

  Journal of Human Genetics (Journal of Human Genetics)  63 ( 63 ) 745 - 748 2018.03

  Research paper (scientific journal), Joint Work, Accepted,  ISSN  14345161

  　View Summary

  Genome editing of human embryos could become a fundamental treatment approach for genetic diseases; however, a few technical and ethical issues need to be resolved before its application in clinical settings. Presently, the Japanese government has issued a statement prohibiting human germline editing and emphasizing the need for discussions that include a wide range of perspectives. However, current discussions tend to exclude the general public. Therefore, we conducted a survey of 10,881 general adults and 1044 patients in Japan who indicated that their disease conditions are related to their genetic makeup, and clarified their attitude toward this technology. The results clearly indicated that the Japanese people generally accepted the use of genome editing for disease-related genes, but many were concerned about the risks. In addition, many Japanese people did not understand the technology well. To improve awareness and understanding about genome editing, it is important that scientists and science communicators create opportunities for the public to participate in relevant discussions without harming vulnerable participants. It is also important to continuously track changes in the acceptance of genome editing by the public.

  • Access to Document (DOI)