Papers - Koizumi, Naoki

特許製品使用済後加工された特許製品に特許権は及ぶ

民商法雑誌 138 ( 6 ) 85-95 2008.09

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work

プロ野球選手の肖像等使用権限の所在をめぐる統一契約書の解釈

斉藤博先生御退職記念論集・現代社会と著作権法 (弘文堂)     1-9 2008

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work

いわゆる「悪意の出願」について

工業所有権法学会年報  ( 31 ) 153-168 2008

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work

Avoiding invalidity risks in court

Naoki Koizumi

Managing Intellectual Property  2007.09

Research paper (conference, symposium, etc.), Joint Work

The changing roles of the patent office and the courts after Fujitsu/TI

Koizumi Naoki, Takenaka Toshiko

  555 - 563 2007

　View Summary

<p>Like many other areas of the Japanese legal system, intellectual property (IP) law has been undergoing major changes over the past decade.¹ These changes are a result of a strong U.S. influence on Japanese patent law and have led to the adoption of pro-patent policy.² A prime example of these trends is found in the patent enforcement process. As originally designed, the Japanese patent system had the Japan Patent Office (JPO) playing a central role in the development of patent policy and also gave the JPO power to decide not only the validity of patents issued but also the protection scope of patents.3 Although revisions of patent law codified in the Patent Act of 1959 had taken away the JPO's power to decide the protection scope,4 JPO's exclusive power to decide patent validity remained intact until the Supreme Court handed down its Fujitsu/TI decision in 2000.5 This decision gave Japanese courts the power to examine the validity of a patent and to refuse to enforce obviously invalid patents. The case signals a departure from German patent validity practice, which the Japanese patent system traditionally followed, and demonstrates movement toward the U.S. approach to patent validity. © 2007 by the University of Washington Press.</p>

平成15年改正著作権法改正附則2条の趣旨及び解釈について

慶應法学 7 ( 205 )  2007

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work

使用済み特許製品の再生に対する特許権の行使の許否

ジュリスト増刊平成18年度重要判例解説  2007

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work

The Changing Roles of the Patent Office and the Courts after Fujitsu/TI

Naoki Koizumi and Toshiko Takenaka

Law in Japan: A Turning Point (University of Washington Press)   2007

Research paper (conference, symposium, etc.), Joint Work

税関による水際取締りへの期待

CIPICジャ－ナル  ( 170 ) 6 2006

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work

特許法35条の解釈に関する周縁的論点

中山信弘先生還暦記念・知的財産法の理論と現代的課題  2005

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work

大学における著作権ル－ル

知財年報2005  2005

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work

国際著作権契約法序説

著作権研究  ( 27 ) 90 2003

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work

特許法35条の適用範囲

民商法雑誌 128 ( 4=5 ) 561 2003

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work

著作権等権利制限と契約・技術的保護手段のインタ－フェイス

コピライト  ( 7 ) 2 2003

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work

Parallel Imports and Intellectual Property Rights in Japan

Japanese Annual of International Law 45   53 2003

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work

特許法35条の外国特許権に対する適用

L&T  ( 19 ) 28 2003

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work

二次的著作物について

半田正夫先生古希記念論集・著作権法と民法の現代的課題    172 2003

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work

機能的著作物の創作性

著作権研究  ( 28 ) 12 2003

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work

The new or evolving access right

Adjuncts and Alternatives to Copyright (ALAI 2001)     1 2002

Research paper (conference, symposium, etc.), Single Work

治療方法発明保護の法政策

ジュリスト  ( 1227 ) 40 2002

Research paper (scientific journal), Single Work