Details of a Researcher - Hayashi, Yoichiro

Reviews, Commentaries, etc. - Hayashi, Yoichiro

Division display 1 - 20 of about 33 ／ All the affair displays >>

フォルガー=コノフスキー=クロパンツァーノ「業績評価におけるデュー・プロセス(法の適正手続き)」—特集現在の労働問題を考える上で改めて読んでおきたい文献

林洋一郎

日本労働研究雑誌 (東京 : 労働政策研究・研修機構) 65 ( 4 ) 42 - 45 2023.04

ISSN 0916-3808

大学入学者選抜における公正観尺度（Justice and Fairness for University and College Entrance Examination Scale：JFUCEE）の作成と信頼性，及び，妥当性の検討

木村拓也, 林洋一郎, 西郡大, 中世古貴彦, 立脇洋介

九州大学大学院教育学研究紀要 25 1 - 26 2023

働き方の多様化が個人・集団に与える影響に関する考察—The Negative Aspects of a Diverse Work Style : Investigation from the Micro Level Perspective

内藤知加恵, 林洋一郎, 川口里香

慶應経営論集 = Keio business forum / 慶應義塾経営管理学会編 (横浜 : 慶應義塾経営管理学会) 37 ( 1 ) 45 - 66 2020.03

ISSN 0387-7086

CiNii Research

Parents' and Adolescents' Retrospective Reports of Parenting Styles in Childhood

佐々木宏之, 林洋一郎

慶応経営論集 (慶応義塾経営管理学会) 34 ( 1 ) 233 - 246 2017.01

ISSN 0387-7086

CiNii Research

組織における公正と不公正の同異性に関する探索的研究

林洋一郎, 関口倫紀

産業・組織心理学会大会発表論文集 30th 203 - 206 2014.08

【D14】リーダーシップ行動がLMX形成と部下の創造的行動に与える影響について : 大学生を対象とした試行的分析

鳥取部真己, 林洋一郎

経営行動科学学会年次大会 : 発表論文集 (経営行動科学学会年次大会準備委員会) ( 17 ) 385 - 390 2014

CiNii Research

組織における公正が従業員のウェルビーイングに与える影響―制御焦点の媒介効果に注目して―

林洋一郎, 関口倫紀, 大崎泰子

産業・組織心理学会大会発表論文集 29th 270 - 273 2013.08

失業者の社会的スキル訓練が職務探索に与える影響 : 中核的自己評価の役割に注目して(Cセッション【研究発表】)

宇佐美康司, 林洋一郎

経営行動科学学会年次大会 : 発表論文集 (経営行動科学学会年次大会準備委員会) ( 16 ) 93 - 98 2013

CiNii Research

Effect of social self-regulation and group identification on university adjustment

中川知宏, 林洋一郎, 梅崎修

キャリアデザイン研究 (日本キャリアデザイン学会) 8 51 - 64 2012.09

ISSN 1880-2753

CiNii Research

JUSTICE AND FAIRNESS IN BUSINESS ORGANIZATION

林洋一郎

組織科学 (白桃書房) 46 ( 1 ) 46 - 57 2012

ISSN 0286-9713

CiNii Research

A review of assessment center and its measurement Issues

林洋一郎

法政大学キャリアデザイン学部紀要 (法政大学キャリアデザイン学部) 8 211 - 228 2011.03

ISSN 1349-3043

This article reviews concepts and structures of assessment center and discusses how it can be applicable to the Japanese organization. First of all, I explain the basic tenets of assessment center from essential elements, types of simulations and history. Here, it is emphasized that the simulation methods in assessment center are expected to be reliable and valid tool for future behaviors among candidates, especially in case that the past behaviors among them are not available or predictive of the future performance. Secondly, the issue of construct validity is raised with an eye to the MTMM (MultiTrait− MultiMethod) matrix and then a couple of ways to handle this problem are discussed. Finally, I suggest that assessment center methods, involving simulation exercises, are to be useful selection tools among college students who generally have no occupational experiences.

CiNii Research

A Theoretical and Psycho-metrical Basis of the Assessment Centers : Controversy around the Construct Validity(A Review of the Assessment Centers: Theories, Adoption, Practices and the Outlook,THE 13^<TH> ANNUAL MEETING OF THE JAPANESE ASSOCIATION OF ADMIN

HAYASHI Yoichiro

The Japanese journal of administrative science (The Japanese Association of Administrative Science) 23 ( 3 ) 230 - 237 2010.12

ISSN 0914-5206

組織的公正研究におけるマルチ・レベル・アプローチ：集合レベル概念の測定法に注目して

林洋一郎

法政大学キャリアデザイン学部紀要 (法政大学キャリアデザイン学部) 7 131 - 140 2010.03

ISSN 1349-3043

The present study discusses how we are to conceptualize organizational justice as a collective concept. Firstly, the authors make a brief review of a history of individual organizational justice researches along the four waves of research and theorizing suggested by Colquitt, Greenberg, & Zapata−Phelan (2004). The following waves of justice studies are also suggested; justice as a moral approach and multi−level approach. Secondly, the measurement issues of collective concepts are discussed. Specifically, I argue the way in which the lower level data can be combined to compose the higher level construct. With regard to procedures for composition, I introduced some statistical techniques to justify aggregating an individual level data to group level. Lastly, future research agenda of interaction between individual and collective justice is discussed.