Hukuhara, Kayoko

写真a

Affiliation

School of Medicine, Center for Preventive Medicine (Shinanomachi)

Position

Instructor
Page Top ▲
 

Research Areas 【 Display / hide 】

  • Life Science / Gastroenterology

Page Top ▲
 

Papers 【 Display / hide 】

  • Linked color imaging versus white light imaging colonoscopy for colorectal adenoma detection: A randomized controlled trial

    Miyaguchi K., Takabayashi K., Saito D., Tsuzuki Y., Hirooka N., Hosoe N., Ohgo H., Ashitani K., Soma H., Miyanaga R., Kimura K., Tokunaga S., Mitsui T., Miura M., Ozaki R., Nakamoto H., Kanai T., Hisamatsu T., Ogata H., Imaeda H.

    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia) (Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia))  36 ( 10 ) 2778 - 2784 2021.10

    ISSN  08159319

    　View Summary

    Background and Aim: The adenoma detection rate is an important indicator of colonoscopy quality and colorectal cancer incidence. We compared the adenoma detection rates between white light imaging (WLI) and linked color imaging (LCI) colonoscopy. Methods: Patients undergoing colonoscopy for positive fecal immunochemical tests, follow-up of colon polyps, and abdominal symptoms at three institutions were randomly assigned to the LCI or WLI groups. Mean adenoma number per patient (including based on endoscopists' experience), adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, mean adenoma number per location, and adenoma size were compared. Results: The LCI and WLI groups comprised 494 and 501 patients, respectively. No significant differences in the cecal intubation rate (LCI vs WLI: 99.5% vs 99.4%), cecal intubation time, and withdrawal time were noted between groups. The mean adenoma number per patient was significantly higher in the LCI group than in the WLI group (1.07 vs 0.88, P = 0.04), particularly in the descending [0.12 (58/494) vs 0.07 (35/501), P = 0.01] and sigmoid colon [0.41 (201/494) vs 0.30 (149/501), P ≤ 0.001]. However, the adenoma detection rate was 47.1% in the LCI group and 46.9% in the WLI group, with no significant difference (P = 0.93). The total number of sessile-type adenomas was significantly higher in the LCI group than in the WLI group (346/494 vs 278/501, P = 0.04). As for polyp size, small polyps (≤ 5 mm) were detected at a significantly higher rate in the LCI group (271/494 vs 336/501, P = 0.04). Conclusion: Linked color imaging is significantly superior to WLI in terms of mean adenoma number per patient.

  • Efficacy of therapeutic intervention for patients with an ulcerative colitis mayo endoscopic score of 1

    Fukuda T., Naganuma M., Sugimoto S., Ono K., Nanki K., Mizuno S., Kimura K., Mutaguchi M., Nakazato Y., Takabayashi K., Inoue N., Ogata H., Iwao Y., Kanai T.

    Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (Inflammatory Bowel Diseases)  25 ( 4 ) 782 - 788 2019.03

    ISSN  10780998

    　View Summary

    © 2018 Crohn's & Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions. Background Mucosal healing (MH) is proposed as a therapeutic target for ulcerative colitis (UC). Recent studies have indicated that the rate of clinical relapse in patients with a Mayo endoscopic score (MES) of 1 is higher than that of patients with an MES of 0. However, no study has yet investigated whether therapeutic intervention prevents clinical relapse in patients with an MES of 1. Methods Patients with UC with an MES of 1 and partial Mayo score ≤2 were included in this study. All patients were followed from first colonoscopy (CS) until follow-up CS. Differences in the rate of clinical relapse (requiring additional treatment for UC) or endoscopic exacerbation (MES ≥2 and proximal extension) were compared between the therapeutic intervention (immediately after first CS) group and the nontherapeutic intervention group; risk factors for relapse were also assessed. Results Among 1523 patients with UC who underwent CS between 2013 and 2016, 220 patients were included in this study. The rate of clinical relapse (P = 0.005) and endoscopic exacerbation (P = 0.11) in patients with therapeutic intervention was lower than that in patients without therapeutic intervention. Multivariable analysis indicated that absence of therapeutic intervention (P = 0.001 for clinical relapse, P = 0.050 for endoscopic exacerbation) and a higher Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity vascular pattern score immediately after first CS (P = 0.021 for clinical relapse, P = 0.019 for endoscopic exacerbation) were risk factors for both clinical relapse and endoscopic exacerbation. Conclusions Therapeutic intervention for patients with UC with an MES of 1 might prevent disease relapse.

  • Clinical utility of novel ultrathin single-balloon enteroscopy: A feasibility study

    Takabayashi K., Hosoe N., Miyanaga R., Fukuhara S., Kimura K., Mizuno S., Naganuma M., Yahagi N., Ogata H., Kanai T.

    Endoscopy (Endoscopy)  51 ( 5 ) 468 - 471 2019

    ISSN  0013726X

    　View Summary

    © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart . New York. Background The advent of balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) has facilitated the examination of the entire digestive tract. However, using a rigid sliding tube during the procedure reduces patient acceptance. This study evaluated the clinical application of a newly developed ultrathin single-balloon enteroscope for BAE. Methods 28 outpatients underwent enteroscopy with a novel ultrathin single-balloon enteroscope. None of the subjects required therapeutic procedures, such as balloon dilation or hemostasis. The insertability, efficacy, and safety of the ultrathin single-balloon endoscope were evaluated retrospectively. Results 7 patients underwent transoral enteroscopy and 21 patients underwent transanal enteroscopy under conscious sedation. No adverse events related to the procedure were reported in any patients. Targeted observation and/or targeted biopsy were achieved in all procedures. All transoral procedures allowed evaluation of the jejunum beyond the ligament of Treitz. All transanal procedures allowed intubation of the terminal ileum, despite several patients having severe stenosis of the colon and ileum. Conclusion A novel ultrathin single-balloon enteroscope showed adequate insertability and safety for outpatient surveillance enteroscopy under conscious sedation.

  • A male Korean who was diagnosed with chronic enteropathy associated with SLCO2A1 (CEAS): Case report with literature review

    Sun X., Hosoe N., Miyanaga R., Kimura K., Mizuno S., Takabayashi K., Naganuma M., Niizeki H., Seki A., Ogata H., Kanai T.

    BMJ Open Gastroenterology (BMJ Open Gastroenterology)  5 ( 1 )  2018

    　View Summary

    © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. Objective To further disseminate the nomenclature of chronic enteropathy associated with SLCO2A1 (CEAS), especially for physicians in China and Korea where the genetic feature of SLCO2A1 gene mutations related hypertrophic osteoarthropathy and pachydermia had been extensively studied. SLCO2A1 gene mutations related hypertrophic osteoarthropathy and pachydermia had been extensively studied. Design A case report with literature review of SLCO2A1 gene mutations-related disorders. Results A 38-year-old Korean presented to a tertiary hospital with dizziness, abdominal pain and melena. He had a positive faecal occult blood test on initial workup. Oesophagogastroduodenal endoscopy (OGD), colonoscopy and CT scan were unremarkable and showed no obvious cause for his melena. Capsule endoscope and roentgen barium studies were performed, revealing an erythematous mucosa with ulcers in the jejunum and stenosis to the jejunal-ileal junction. Next-generation sequencing was then performed and discovered point mutations of SLCO2A1 gene's seven exon (940+1 G>A) and 13 exon (1807 C>T) allele. This Korean patient with CEAS is the first documented case noted outside of the Japanese population. Conclusion CEAS is not uniquely found in Japanese individuals. There are lots of similarities between CEAS and primary hypertrophic osteoarthropathy, the two entity may just be the two sides of one same coin. International and multidisciplined efforts are required to further study this complicated disorder.

  • Cutoff Pepsinogen Level for Predicting Unintendedly Eradicated Cases of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Subjects with Seemingly Normal Pepsinogen Levels

    Kishikawa Hiroshi, Kimura Kayoko, Ito Asako, Arahata Kyoko, Takarabe Sakiko, Kaida Shogo, Miyauchi Jun, Miura Soichiro, Kanai Takanori, Nishida Jiro

    Digestion    229 - 236 2017.03

    ISSN  0012-2823

    　View Summary

    <p>Backgrounds/Aims: In the ABC method, which is a method for risk stratification of gastric cancer using serum anti-Helicobacter pylori antibody and pepsinogen (PG) test, subjects with normal PG and seronegative for H. pylori are named as “Group A” and are regarded as having a low risk of gastric cancer. These “Group A” subjects include unintentionally eradicated cases at relatively high risk, and this study aimed to identify these subjects. Methods: Of the 109 subjects, 76 were classified as uninfected Group A subjects with negative histologic H. pylori infection and no histologic and endoscopic atrophy, and 33 subjects were classified serologically as Group A after successful eradication, which are serologically equal to the unintendedly eradicated cases in Group A. The usefulness of measuring PG levels to detect post-eradication cases was validated by using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: The area under the ROC curve for PGI level was 0.736 ± 0.06 (p &lt; 0.01; cutoff value, 37.0 ng/mL; sensitivity, 77.6%; specificity, 72.7%), and that for the PGI/II ratio was 0.660 ± 0.06 (p &lt; 0.01; cutoff value, 5.1; sensitivity, 84.2%; specificity, 43.4%). Conclusion: PGI levels of ≤37 ng/mL and PGI/II ratios of ≤5.1 effectively identified unintendedly eradicated cases in Group A.</p>

display all >>

Page Top ▲

Reviews, Commentaries, etc. 【 Display / hide 】

Page Top ▲
 

Social Activities 【 Display / hide 】

  • 日本カプセル内視鏡学会

    2017.02
    -
    Present

  • 日本消化管学会

    2017.02
    -
    Present

  • 日本内視鏡学会

    2010.02
    -
    Present

  • 日本消化器病学会

    2010.01
    -
    Present

  • 日本内科学会

    2009.12
    -
    Present
Page Top ▲